From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: The virtuailization patches break Voyager. Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:18:53 -0700 Message-ID: <463373ED.8040103@goop.org> References: <1177775271.3688.30.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: James Bottomley , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Reasonable. I think we would have fewer people to yell at if we > restructured things a bit. > > The fact that we have prominent people deliberately ignoring voyager > during development I find disturbing. > > In this case I just happened to stumble onto the problem while I was > looking at something else, and decided it wasn't worth doing > development on code that was broken to start with. Well, you've shamed me into fixing it. I'm putting together a fix-voyager-build patch now. J