From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: paravirt_ops queue rebased Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 11:14:45 -0700 Message-ID: <463F6C95.10103@xensource.com> References: <463E0E8D.3050806@goop.org> <1178475147.3760.36.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> <463E647A.8060505@goop.org> <1178558797.3729.21.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1178558797.3729.21.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Virtualization Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org James Bottomley wrote: > The original one you sent had duplicate smp_call_function... > definitions. The interdiff between the one you've attached now and the > one I sent is pretty tiny: > Huh. Must have been a mixup somewhere, because this was one was more or less identical to the last one. Maybe I'd sent out an earlier borken one you picked up? Anyway, doesn't matter. > + u32 mask = cpus_addr(cpumask)[0]; > Ah, didn't know about that. J