From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.osdl.org,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [patch 8/9] lguest: the block driver
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 18:08:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46434378.1020900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020705090322jc37884drc31b97879648d09@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/09/2007 12:22 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> +static void end_entire_request(struct request *req, int uptodate)
>> +{
>> + if (end_that_request_first(req, uptodate, req->hard_nr_sectors))
>> + BUG();
>> + add_disk_randomness(req->rq_disk);
>> + blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
>> + end_that_request_last(req, uptodate);
>> +}
>
> Again, I would prefer this went straight into block/ll_rw_blk.c. Rene
> and I am using something similar in the new Mitsumi driver although
> one of us has a bug already, we're using req->nr_sectors for this...
The req->hard_nr_sectors is specifically marked block layer internal and
since nr_sectors is what we're requesting and reading (we can't deal with
partial transfers anyway since the drive won't tell us where it failed as
far as I've been able to see and we do want to make read requests for as
many sectors as possible at a time for speed) I believe that in our case the
nr_sectors is fine.
Rene.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-09 9:51 [patch 8/9] lguest: the block driver akpm
2007-05-09 10:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-09 10:29 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-09 10:46 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-05-09 10:54 ` Jens Axboe
2007-05-10 16:08 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-05-11 12:09 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46434378.1020900@gmail.com \
--to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).