From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Extending boot protocol & bzImage for paravirt_ops Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 01:19:28 +0100 Message-ID: <4658CE90.5090008@goop.org> References: <4656FB8F.4090604@goop.org> <4658C704.2050405@goop.org> <4658CD70.2080702@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4658CD70.2080702@zytor.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Chris Wright , Virtualization Mailing List , "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Pardon me for saying it, but it's hardly a hardship to add support for a > single additional constant in existing code. I'm starting to think this > argument is approaching not just the silly, but downright ridiculous. > Well, if the existing code is a standard libelf/libbfd, it could be tricky. > Another option is to have the ELF header at a nonzero offset. > Yes, that's exactly what I'm proposing. J