From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:38:31 -0700 Message-ID: <46CCD707.1090009@goop.org> References: <46CBC842.4070100@vmware.com> <46CCB088.8070606@goop.org> <46CCB56F.8090308@superbug.co.uk> <20070822222036.GD3672@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <46CCB8BA.6060007@superbug.demon.co.uk> <46CCC361.6020600@goop.org> <20070823004700.GR2642@bingen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070823004700.GR2642@bingen.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: James Courtier-Dutton , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Wright , Virtualization Mailing List List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 04:14:41PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > >> (which would also have VT, since >> all new processors do). >> > > Not true unfortunately. The Intel low end parts like Celerons (which > are actually shipped in very large numbers) don't. Also Intel > is still shipping some CPUs that don't support it at all, like > the ULV Centrinos which are based on an older core. > Likely to be missing VT-d too, right? J