From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:59:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4713E2D6.90801@goop.org> References: <20071015204840.074767068@goop.org> <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Linus Torvalds , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, LKML , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Keir Fraser , Stable Kernel List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Greg KH wrote: > Yeah, but you cc:ed all 12 patches to stable@. The majority of which we > don't want to take, right? Which specific ones should stable@ care > about? Crap, sorry about that. I'd just intended to send the overview and the four patches, which have explicit CC: stable lines in the patch descriptions. They are: Subject: [PATCH 06/12] xen: add batch completion callbacks Subject: [PATCH 07/12] xen: deal with stale cr3 values when unpinning pagetables Subject: [PATCH 10/12] xen: fix incorrect vcpu_register_vcpu_info hypercall argument Subject: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: eagerly remove vmap mappings to avoid upsetting Xen J