From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: Juan Quintela <juan.quintela@gmail.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
"virtualization@lists.osdl.org" <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Next steps with pv_ops for Xen
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:30:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474BE3D1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474B15FC.4050901@goop.org>
>> It breaks with:
>>
>> Intel machine check architecture supported.
>> (XEN) traps.c:1734:d0 Domain attempted WRMSR 00000404 from 00000000:00000001 to
>> ffffffff:ffffffff.
>> Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.
>> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
>> Modules linked in:
>>
>
>Hm. Looks like Xen is getting upset about dom0 trying to disable
>caching. No, wait: 0xffffffff:ffffffff? That's strange; I wonder if
>its just misreporting the value, because the code doesn't look like its
>trying to write that.
>
>Either way, the fix is to implement xen_write_cr0, and mask off any bits
>that Xen won't want us to set/clear (or if it doesn't allow dom0 to
>change cr0, just ignore all updates).
Why do you think that's a CR0 write? The messages clearly indicate an
MSR write, and these writes are clearly visible in intel_p{4,6}_mcheck_init()
and amd_mcheck_init(). The question is why intel_p4_mcheck_init() doesn't
check CPUID bits before trying to touch any registers... (And similarly
amd_mcheck_init() is checking only the MCE bit, not the MCA one.)
But then I just noticed that Xen itself doesn't clear the MCE/MCA bits either
in emulate_forced_invalid_op(), apparently under the assumption that PV
guests wouldn't try to make use of this feature.
A simple workaround would be to force mce_disabled to 1 in early Xen
initialization.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-27 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 22:05 Next steps with pv_ops for Xen Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-11-21 23:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-26 14:02 ` Juan Quintela
2007-11-26 18:52 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-27 8:30 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2007-11-27 17:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-27 17:14 ` Jan Beulich
2007-11-27 17:15 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-12-03 12:54 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-03 13:19 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-03 14:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-03 14:51 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-03 17:18 ` Mark Williamson
2007-12-03 18:36 ` D.G. Murray
2007-12-03 19:08 ` Mark Williamson
2007-12-04 9:35 ` tgh
2007-12-05 3:42 ` Mark Williamson
2007-12-06 15:21 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-06 15:32 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-06 15:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-21 12:58 ` [Xen-devel] " Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-03 20:38 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-04 9:40 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-04 12:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-04 12:39 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-12-04 19:58 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 11:48 ` [Xen-devel] " Derek Murray
2007-12-05 13:19 ` Derek Murray
[not found] ` <47569014.8080008@cl.cam.ac.uk>
2007-12-05 14:12 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 14:22 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-05 14:30 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-05 16:58 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-05 17:17 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-05 17:22 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-05 17:48 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-05 17:59 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-05 18:15 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-12 8:27 ` Isaku Yamahata
2007-12-12 8:39 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-12 8:44 ` Isaku Yamahata
2007-12-05 20:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 18:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-05 18:29 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-05 20:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-05 20:35 ` Geoffrey Lefebvre
2007-12-06 10:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 20:44 ` Keir Fraser
2007-12-06 10:00 ` Derek Murray
2007-12-06 19:55 ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-12-05 10:03 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 12:51 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-12-05 10:11 ` Derek Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474BE3D1.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=juan.quintela@gmail.com \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).