From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use PCI revision field to indicate virtio PCI ABI version Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <479F4E31.3040808@qumranet.com> References: <1201535999-13998-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <479F3E8D.8000308@us.ibm.com> <479F4704.8080107@qumranet.com> <200801291639.59184.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200801291639.59184.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Christian Borntraeger Cc: Anthony Liguori , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Christian Borntraeger wrote: > Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 schrieb Avi Kivity: > >> Yeah, okay. We'll bump it one last time when 2.6.25 is released. >> >> I'll merge the userspace side. >> > > Do we really want to freeze the interface for virtio already with 2.6.25? > Maybe every possible issue is found then, but I would prefer to have a more > flexible schedule on finalizing virtio. Dont know if I am just paranoid... > We can always bump it again if we find out we suck. But I hope three months ought to do it. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function