From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: State of Xen in upstream Linux Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:45:37 -0700 Message-ID: <48920851.3080401@goop.org> References: <48910C99.10606@goop.org> <20080731090845.GH23888@redhat.com> <4891FFBA.1020702@goop.org> <20080731183634.GA27147@gallifrey> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080731183634.GA27147@gallifrey> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Virtualization Mailing List , Grant McWilliams , "Daniel P. Berrange" , Xen-devel , xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > Does that include things like /proc/cpuinfo? Current Dom0's seem > to lose some of the physical IDs information from there. Dom0's vcpus don't necessarily have any fixed relationship to the underlying physical cpus, so there's no real way they could. Dom0 might not even have as many vcpus as there are pcpus. So I think that's expected. J