From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:53:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB90127.2000809@goop.org> References: <1253233028.19731.63.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090920095239.456ad6f2@infradead.org> <4AB5EF25.9070502@redhat.com> <200909221652.35446.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200909221652.35446.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: Avi Kivity , Arjan van de Ven , Ingo Molnar , Alok Kataria , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Chris Wright , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 09/22/09 00:22, Rusty Russell wrote: > When they're all gone, even I don't think lguest is sufficient excuse > to keep CONFIG_PARAVIRT. Oh well. But that will probably be a while= =2E > =20 /Solidarno=C5=9B=C4=87/! J