From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:30:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB925DB.1070906@goop.org> References: <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> <1253419185.3253.21.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090920074247.GA5733@elte.hu> <20090920095239.456ad6f2@infradead.org> <4AB5EF25.9070502@redhat.com> <4AB64EFC.10707@goop.org> <20090922080913.GB1475@elte.hu> <4AB900CC.7090409@goop.org> <20090922180216.GA16789@elte.hu> <4AB91478.2050508@goop.org> <20090922190419.GA24542@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090922190419.GA24542@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Avi Kivity , Arjan van de Ven , Alok Kataria , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , George Dunlap List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 09/22/09 12:04, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Sorry for being dense, but what does that mean precisely? No available > hardware? Xen doesnt run? Nobody has implemented hybrid PV mode yet, so we haven't got anything to measure. Also, I don't think there have been very many measurements of Linux HVM (full virtualization) Xen guests, because Linux is typically run paravirtualized and HVM support is primarily tuned for Windows guests. J