From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:27:40 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB9414C.6060805@zytor.com> References: <1253233028.19731.63.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> <1253419185.3253.21.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090920074247.GA5733@elte.hu> <1253647845.10565.20.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1253647845.10565.20.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akataria@vmware.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Alok Kataria wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 00:42 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> The thing is, the overwhelming majority of vmware users dont benefit >> from hardware features like nested page tables yet. So this needs to be >> done _way_ more carefully, with a proper sunset period of a couple of >> kernel cycles. > > I am fine with that too. Below is a patch which adds notes in > feature-removal-schedule.txt, I have marked it for removal from 2.6.34. > Please consider this patch for 2.6.32. > This seems way, way too early still. -hpa