From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4AB956AC.9050700@zytor.com> References: <1253233028.19731.63.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> <1253419185.3253.21.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090920074247.GA5733@elte.hu> <1253647845.10565.20.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <4AB9414C.6060805@zytor.com> <1253656476.10565.28.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1253656476.10565.28.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akataria@vmware.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Alok Kataria wrote: > > What do you suggest would be the right time ? > > Please note that the next major release of VMware's product will not > have this supported. Also that, most of our customers will actually be > running some distro's enterprise release, rather than running the > cutting edge kernel. So IMO there is still a window of around 1-1.5 > years, until a customer actually sees a kernel which has dropped VMI > support. > I would say it might make sense pulling it out around the end of 2010, which would be about 6 kernel releases from now -- 2.6.37. -hpa