From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Paravirtualization on VMware's Platform [VMI]. Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:51:47 -0700 Message-ID: <4AC23B23.2050506@zytor.com> References: <1253233028.19731.63.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090919224430.GB9567@kroah.com> <1253419185.3253.21.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090920074247.GA5733@elte.hu> <1253647845.10565.20.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <4AB9CE66.1030504@redhat.com> <1254185107.13456.32.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> <20090929100831.18ece319@infradead.org> <1254242989.7803.11.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1254242989.7803.11.camel@ank32.eng.vmware.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akataria@vmware.com Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Gerd Hoffmann , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright , Rusty Russell , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 09/29/2009 09:49 AM, Alok Kataria wrote: > > So, are you saying that we should be doing something else along with > toggling it off in the Kconfig ? > We have already informed most of the distro folks about this deprecation > so I think we should be okay there, but if there is something else that > should be done, do let me know. > I don't see it ever having been anything than off by default in Kconfig. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.