From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: Patch to auto-load MSFT PV NIC driver Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 16:02:17 -0700 Message-ID: <4BE5ED79.9080008@goop.org> References: <4BE453510200003000084906@sinclair.provo.novell.com> <8AFC7968D54FB448A30D8F38F259C5621AFFB3F9@TK5EX14MBXC114.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <20100508142716.GA32133@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100508142716.GA32133@kroah.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org Errors-To: devel-bounces@linuxdriverproject.org To: Greg KH Cc: "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "Virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Ky Srinivasan , Haiyang Zhang List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 05/08/2010 07:27 AM, Greg KH wrote: > How would you do that? The symbol resolution will not allow hv_netvsc > to be loaded without hv_vmbus being around. > > Now I do think that just adding the same pci/dmi ids to all of the > modules is a bit odd, and that something else needs to be done here, but > at the moment, I can't think of anything better. > Could you make hv_vmbus a real bus implementation, which knows how to enumerate and probe devices hanging off it? J