From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: hv block drivers Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:35:35 -0700 Message-ID: <4C7BEBE7.8060502@goop.org> References: <201008301643.42253.arnd@arndb.de> <4C7BD9A6.1090108@goop.org> <201008301908.51521.arnd@arndb.de> <8AFC7968D54FB448A30D8F38F259C56224274727@TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8AFC7968D54FB448A30D8F38F259C56224274727@TK5EX14MBXC118.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Hank Janssen Cc: Arnd Bergmann , "'virtualization@lists.osdl.org'" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Stefano Stabellini , "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 08/30/2010 10:31 AM, Hank Janssen wrote: > For a more general question, When/if we make it out of staging, where should these drivers live? > > drivers/hyper-v or drivers/scsi and drivers/ide. > > Is there a standard that is being followed? If they're not actually scsi/ide subsystem drivers, then drivers/block would seem like the best place (and drivers/ide is truly ancient stuff, I think). J