From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC] kvm tools: Add support for virtio-mmio Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:18:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4EC2AD09.2040000@redhat.com> References: <1321375667-17284-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1321379773.3200.9.camel@lappy> <4EC2ABEC.1040007@redhat.com> <1321380834.3200.10.camel@lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1321380834.3200.10.camel@lappy> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Sasha Levin Cc: Peter Maydell , Pawel Moll , kvm@vger.kernel.org, asias.hejun@gmail.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, gorcunov@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 11/15/2011 08:13 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > > Hmm... If thats the plan, it should probably be a virtio thing (not > > > virtio-mmio specific). > > > > > > Either way, it could also use some clarification in the spec. > > > > The spec only covers virtio-pci; this virtio-mmio is completely > > unspec'ed. IMO it's a timebomb waiting to explode. > > It is, look at Appendix X of the virtio-pci spec. > Ah, okay, a pleasant surprise. From a quick look, it seems okay, but I think endianness specification is missing. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function