From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:21:15 +0530
Message-ID: <4F765503.9040801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20120321102041.473.61069.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com>
	<4F7616F5.4070000@zytor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F7616F5.4070000@zytor.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@citrix.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@amd.com>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

On 03/31/2012 01:56 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> What is the current status of this patchset?  I haven't looked at it too
> closely because I have been focused on 3.4 up until now...
>

Thanks Peter,

Currently targeting the patchset for next merge window. IMO These
patches are in good shape now. I' ll rebase these patches and send it
ASAP. It needs "jumplabel split patch" (from Andrew Jones) as
dependency, I would fold that patch (got ok from him for that) also
into series, and send them ASAP.

  - Raghu