From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghavendra K T Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC V7 0/12] Paravirtualized ticketlocks Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:34:41 +0530 Message-ID: <4F9FDF69.8090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120419201209.5411.43877.sendpatchset@codeblue> <1335876646.6038.101.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1335876646.6038.101.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Andrew Jones , Xen Devel , KVM , Stefano Stabellini , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Andi Kleen , Stephan Diestelhorst , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , "H. Peter Anvin" , Attilio Rao , Ingo Molnar , Virtualization , Linus Torvalds , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Avi Kivity List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 05/01/2012 06:20 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:12 +0100, Raghavendra K T wrote: >> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge >> >> This series replaces the existing paravirtualized spinlock mechanism >> with a paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism. (targeted for 3.5 window) > > Which tree is this series going through, tip.git I guess? > > I don't see it there. > > Ian. > Yes you are right. I am trying to post ticketlock + xen + kvm patches series in one go. There are some discussions on kvm patches last few days. So I am putting up all of them together now. I am planning to post within half/one day.