From: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:24:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDFFEF8.9000609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QXj0brxkTRGCMcjYU3AZwFbk+O5D2ATNz8GLECt9rNs7w@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/18/2012 06:58 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> As long as the latency is decreasing that's good. But It's worth
> keeping in mind that these percentages are probably wildly different
> on real storage devices and/or qemu-kvm. What we don't know here is
> whether this bottleneck matters in real environments - results with
> real storage and with qemu-kvm would be interesting.
Yes. Here is the performance data on a Fusion-IO SSD device.
Fio test is performed in a 8 vcpu guest with Fusion-IO based guest using
kvm tool.
Short version:
With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write
IOPS boost : 11%, 11%, 13%, 10%
Latency improvement: 10%, 10%, 12%, 10%
Long Version:
With bio-based IO path:
read : io=2048.0MB, bw=58920KB/s, iops=117840 , runt= 35593msec
write: io=2048.0MB, bw=64308KB/s, iops=128616 , runt= 32611msec
read : io=3095.7MB, bw=59633KB/s, iops=119266 , runt= 53157msec
write: io=3095.7MB, bw=62993KB/s, iops=125985 , runt= 50322msec
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1284.3K, avg=128109.01, stdev=71513.29
clat (usec): min=94 , max=962339 , avg=116832.95, stdev=65836.80
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1846.6K, avg=128509.99, stdev=89575.07
clat (usec): min=0 , max=2256.4K, avg=121361.84, stdev=82747.25
cpu : usr=56.79%, sys=421.70%, ctx=147335118, majf=21080, minf=19852517
cpu : usr=61.81%, sys=455.53%, ctx=143269950, majf=16027, minf=24800604
cpu : usr=63.10%, sys=455.38%, ctx=178373538, majf=16958, minf=24822612
cpu : usr=62.04%, sys=453.58%, ctx=226902362, majf=16089, minf=23278105
With request-based IO path:
read : io=2048.0MB, bw=52896KB/s, iops=105791 , runt= 39647msec
write: io=2048.0MB, bw=57856KB/s, iops=115711 , runt= 36248msec
read : io=3095.7MB, bw=52387KB/s, iops=104773 , runt= 60510msec
write: io=3095.7MB, bw=57310KB/s, iops=114619 , runt= 55312msec
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1532.6K, avg=142085.62, stdev=109196.84
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1487.4K, avg=129110.71, stdev=114973.64
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1388.6K, avg=145049.22, stdev=107232.55
clat (usec): min=0 , max=1465.9K, avg=133585.67, stdev=110322.95
cpu : usr=44.08%, sys=590.71%, ctx=451812322, majf=14841, minf=17648641
cpu : usr=48.73%, sys=610.78%, ctx=418953997, majf=22164, minf=26850689
cpu : usr=45.58%, sys=581.16%, ctx=714079216, majf=21497, minf=22558223
cpu : usr=48.40%, sys=599.65%, ctx=656089423, majf=16393, minf=23824409
--
Asias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-19 4:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 6:53 [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:02 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk Asias He
2012-06-18 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 8:03 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 11:14 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-18 11:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-19 2:51 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 6:21 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-20 4:46 ` Asias He
2012-06-21 9:49 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-01 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87r4svxcjw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-07-02 2:45 ` Asias He
2012-07-02 6:41 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 0:39 ` Asias He
2012-07-04 2:40 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-06 1:03 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <4FF2F417.2010209@redhat.com>
2012-07-03 14:02 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 14:22 ` Ronen Hod
2012-07-03 14:28 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-04 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-18 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-19 2:21 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 10:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-18 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 2:30 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 9:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 4:24 ` Asias He [this message]
2012-06-19 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDFFEF8.9000609@redhat.com \
--to=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).