From: Dor Laor <dlaor@redhat.com>
To: Asias He <asias@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:49:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE2EE18.9050307@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE155B3.8020206@redhat.com>
On 06/20/2012 07:46 AM, Asias He wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 02:21 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 06/19/2012 05:51 AM, Asias He wrote:
>>> On 06/18/2012 07:39 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:14 +0300, Dor Laor wrote:
>>>>> On 06/18/2012 01:05 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:03:23 +0800, Asias He<asias@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 06/18/2012 03:46 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:53:10 +0800, Asias He<asias@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> This patch introduces bio-based IO path for virtio-blk.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why make it optional?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> request-based IO path is useful for users who do not want to bypass
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> IO scheduler in guest kernel, e.g. users using spinning disk. For
>>>>>>> users
>>>>>>> using fast disk device, e.g. SSD device, they can use bio-based IO
>>>>>>> path.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Users using a spinning disk still get IO scheduling in the host
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>> What benefit is there in doing it in the guest as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> The io scheduler waits for requests to merge and thus batch IOs
>>>>> together. It's not important w.r.t spinning disks since the host
>>>>> can do
>>>>> it but it causes much less vmexits which is the key issue for VMs.
>>>>
>>>> Is the amount of exits caused by virtio-blk significant at all with
>>>> EVENT_IDX?
>>>
>>> Yes. EVENT_IDX saves the number of notify and interrupt. Let's take the
>>> interrupt as an example, The guest fires 200K request to host, the
>>> number of interrupt is about 6K thanks to EVENT_IDX. The ratio is 200K /
>>> 6K = 33. The ratio of merging is 40000K / 200K = 20.
>>>
>>
>> In this case, why don't you always recommend bio over request based?
>
> This case shows that IO scheduler's merging in guest saves a lot of
> requests to host side. Why should I recommend bio over request based here?
>
Does it merge 20 request _on top_ of what event idx does? Of course if
that's the case, we should keep that.
Dor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-21 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-18 6:53 [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 21:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:02 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper Asias He
2012-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk Asias He
2012-06-18 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 8:03 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18 11:14 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-18 11:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-06-19 2:51 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 6:21 ` Dor Laor
2012-06-20 4:46 ` Asias He
2012-06-21 9:49 ` Dor Laor [this message]
2012-07-01 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
[not found] ` <87r4svxcjw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2012-07-02 2:45 ` Asias He
2012-07-02 6:41 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 0:39 ` Asias He
2012-07-04 2:40 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-06 1:03 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 13:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <4FF2F417.2010209@redhat.com>
2012-07-03 14:02 ` Asias He
2012-07-03 14:22 ` Ronen Hod
2012-07-03 14:28 ` Dor Laor
2012-07-04 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-06-18 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-19 2:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-19 2:21 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 10:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-06-18 10:45 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 2:30 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 9:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Improve virtio-blk performance Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-18 9:39 ` Asias He
2012-06-18 10:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-06-19 4:24 ` Asias He
2012-06-19 10:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE2EE18.9050307@redhat.com \
--to=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=asias@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).