From: William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, farman@linux.ibm.com,
hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:01:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d7fc371-4357-496f-9774-1f7a7c1a3091@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875x3jn94r.fsf@redhat.com>
On 6/15/2026 10:58 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15 2026, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:54:07 +0200
>> William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
>>> subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
>>> detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
>>> rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
>>> in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
>>> react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
>>> and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
>>> cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
>>> attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
>>> virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
>>> -ENODEV.
>> Hi William!
>>
>> Are you saying that ccw_device_start() started returning -EINVAL
>> since 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on
>> DNV")? Or did I somehow read the paragraph wrong?
>>
>> The funcition ccw_device_start is documented to return:
>> * Returns:
>> * %0, if the operation was successful;
>> * -%EBUSY, if the device is busy, or status pending;
>> * -%EACCES, if no path specified in @lpm is operational;
>> * -%ENODEV, if the device is not operational.
>> and the commit message does not say a thing about introducing -EINVAL to
>> the mix.
> The function may return -EINVAL for non-enabled subchannels
> (i.e. pmcw.ena == 0), maybe we get an all-zeroes schib with dnv == 0?
> I'd expect it not to be enabled in that case anyway.
Yep, that's at least how I've come to understand what changed. The
function ccw_device_start_timeout_key() has always returned -EINVAL
for non-enabled subchannels (pmcw.ena == 0), though it's not
documented in the header.
What changed with commit 8c58a229688c is that cio_update_schib() now
updates the schib even when DNV=0, rather than returning early as it
did previously. Somehow this update results in pmcw.ena == 0 in
ccw_device_start_timeout_key(). Previously, it saw pmcw.ena == 1 and
moved to the condition (cdev->private->state == DEV_STATE_NOT_OPER)
where it returned -ENODEV.
So the commit didn't introduce -EINVAL as a new return value, rather,
it changed the subchannel lifecycle such that existing paths now
propagate -EINVAL rather than -ENODEV during the device detach
scenario.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-15 14:58 ` Cornelia Huck
2026-06-15 20:01 ` William Bezenah [this message]
2026-06-15 21:42 ` Halil Pasic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d7fc371-4357-496f-9774-1f7a7c1a3091@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wbezenah@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox