Linux virtualization list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, farman@linux.ibm.com,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, vneethv@linux.ibm.com,
	oberpar@linux.ibm.com, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:01:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d7fc371-4357-496f-9774-1f7a7c1a3091@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875x3jn94r.fsf@redhat.com>


On 6/15/2026 10:58 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15 2026, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 17:54:07 +0200
>> William Bezenah <wbezenah@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since commit 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the
>>> subchannel based on DNV"), subchannel behavior following a device
>>> detach has been updated and results in -EINVAL being propagated
>>> rather than -ENODEV, originating from ccw_device_start_timeout_key()
>>> in cio/device_ops. In the end, the virtio driver has no ability to
>>> react to the difference between device and subchannel states here,
>>> and during detach, both -ENODEV and -EINVAL indicate the device
>>> cannot be used and should not be treated as errors requiring
>>> attention. Update error handling in virtio_ccw_del_vq() and
>>> virtio_ccw_drop_indicator() to suppress -EINVAL in addition to
>>> -ENODEV.
>> Hi William!
>>
>> Are you saying that ccw_device_start() started returning -EINVAL
>> since 8c58a229688c ("s390/cio: Do not unregister the subchannel based on
>> DNV")? Or did I somehow read the paragraph wrong?
>>
>> The funcition ccw_device_start is documented to return:
>>  * Returns:                                                                     
>>  *  %0, if the operation was successful;                                        
>>  *  -%EBUSY, if the device is busy, or status pending;                          
>>  *  -%EACCES, if no path specified in @lpm is operational;                      
>>  *  -%ENODEV, if the device is not operational. 
>> and the commit message does not say a thing about introducing -EINVAL to
>> the mix.
> The function may return -EINVAL for non-enabled subchannels
> (i.e. pmcw.ena == 0), maybe we get an all-zeroes schib with dnv == 0?
> I'd expect it not to be enabled in that case anyway.

Yep, that's at least how I've come to understand what changed. The
function ccw_device_start_timeout_key() has always returned -EINVAL
for non-enabled subchannels (pmcw.ena == 0), though it's not
documented in the header.

What changed with commit 8c58a229688c is that cio_update_schib() now
updates the schib even when DNV=0, rather than returning early as it
did previously. Somehow this update results in pmcw.ena == 0 in
ccw_device_start_timeout_key(). Previously, it saw pmcw.ena == 1 and
moved to the condition (cdev->private->state == DEV_STATE_NOT_OPER)
where it returned -ENODEV.

So the commit didn't introduce -EINVAL as a new return value, rather,
it changed the subchannel lifecycle such that existing paths now
propagate -EINVAL rather than -ENODEV during the device detach
scenario.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-12 15:54 [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: Also suppress -EINVAL on device detach William Bezenah
2026-06-14 22:23 ` Halil Pasic
2026-06-15 14:58   ` Cornelia Huck
2026-06-15 20:01     ` William Bezenah [this message]
2026-06-15 21:42       ` Halil Pasic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d7fc371-4357-496f-9774-1f7a7c1a3091@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=wbezenah@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox