From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] virtio_balloon: introduce migration primitives to balloon pages Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:56:59 -0400 Message-ID: <502ABB9B.90108__32455.2617305473$1344977841$gmane$org@redhat.com> References: <20120813084123.GF14081@redhat.com> <20120814182244.GB13338@t510.redhat.com> <20120814195139.GA28870@redhat.com> <20120814195916.GC28870@redhat.com> <20120814200830.GD22133@t510.redhat.com> <20120814202401.GB28990@redhat.com> <20120814202949.GF22133@t510.redhat.com> <20120814204906.GD28990@redhat.com> <20120814205426.GA29162@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120814205426.GA29162@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Rafael Aquini , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andi Kleen , Minchan Kim , Andrew Morton List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 08/14/2012 04:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > To clarify, the global state that this patch adds, is ugly > even if we didn't support multiple balloons yet. > So I don't think I can accept such a patch. > Rusty has a final word here, maybe he thinks differently. Before deciding that "does not support multiple balloon drivers at once" is an issue, is there any use case at all for having multiple balloon drivers active at a time? I do not see any. -- All rights reversed