From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache when possible Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:34:07 +0200 Message-ID: <503F419F.5040800@gmail.com> References: <1346159043-16446-1-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <1346159043-16446-2-git-send-email-levinsasha928@gmail.com> <20120828132032.GB2039@redhat.com> <503CC904.3050207@gmail.com> <20120829110748.GB5970@redhat.com> <503E2F27.5060904@gmail.com> <20120829151445.GC7407@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120829151445.GC7407@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: avi@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 08/29/2012 05:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> > Note that these are simple tests with netperf listening on one end and a simple >> > 'netperf -H [host]' within the guest. If there are other tests which may be >> > interesting please let me know. > Checking that host CPU utilization did not jump would be nice. > E.g. measure BW/host CPU. Tested it now, no change in CPU between the original, patch 1 and patch 2. Thanks, Sasha