From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] vhost-scsi: Add support for host virtualized target
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 14:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <510676B5.4070209@redhat.com>
References: <1347000499-28701-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org>
	<20130117164314.GA19458@redhat.com>
	<1358456841.18551.48.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
	<20130121085034.GA31047@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130121085034.GA31047@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/>
List-Post: <mailto:virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization>,
	<mailto:virtualization-request@lists.linux-foundation.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@cn.ibm.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>, lf-virt <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org

Il 21/01/2013 09:50, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> Unfortunately, I've not been able to get back to the conversion
>> requested by Paolo for a standalone vhost-scsi PCI device.
> 
> It doesn't have to be a standalone device. A vhost=on frontend
> option is also OK I think. Paolo, any objections?

Sorry, I missed this message.

I asked for a standalone device because the configuration mechanism
(configfs vs. command-line) and the feature set are completely
different.  Unlike virtio-net, it's not possible to switch one to the
other at run time.

Paolo