From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: Define virtio-mmio registers as LE Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 13:16:52 +0000 Message-ID: <5130AA44.7030902@arm.com> References: <87wqubkalj.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <1360839247-9131-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com> <513085EA.8070007@arm.com> <1362135005.3052.26.camel@hornet> <51308F22.7040303@arm.com> <1362141432.3052.28.camel@hornet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1362141432.3052.28.camel@hornet> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pawel Moll Cc: "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Michael S. Tsirkin" List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 01/03/13 12:37, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 11:21 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Having said that, Rusty was contemplating enforcing LE config space in >>> the new PCI layout... >> >> I wouldn't complain about that, and would like to see a similar thing on >> MMIO. > > Wherever PCI goes, MMIO follows :-) Sweet. Makes my life easier ;-). >> Well, it was unclear enough for me to get confused... ;-) It would make >> sense to have a wording similar to the one in the PCI section. > > How about this? > > 8<--------- > From a80f01f15397395a8fc49ef424a2d47c8be0937a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pawel Moll > Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:35:06 +0000 > Subject: [PATCH] virtio-spec: Clarify virtio-mmio configuration space organisation > > To clarify potential confusion regarding the configuration > space organisation (endianness in particular) the spec > should clearly state that it follows the PCI device behaviour. > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll Looks good to me! M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...