From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] tcm_vhost lock and flush fix Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 12:14:56 +0100 Message-ID: <513F0E30.2030004@redhat.com> References: <1363056171-5854-1-git-send-email-asias@redhat.com> <513EE6C2.1060003@redhat.com> <20130312111202.GB6788@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130312111202.GB6788@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Hajnoczi List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org Il 12/03/2013 12:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 09:26:42AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Il 12/03/2013 03:42, Asias He ha scritto: >>> Asias He (4): >>> tcm_vhost: Add missed lock in vhost_scsi_clear_endpoint() >>> tcm_vhost: Introduce tcm_vhost_check_endpoint() >>> tcm_vhost: Fix vs->vs_endpoint checking in vhost_scsi_handle_vq() >>> tcm_vhost: Flush vhost_work in vhost_scsi_flush() >>> >>> drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> Patch 1, 2, 4: >> >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini > > How is 2 useful without 3? I can still say I reviewed it and Asias can include the tag in the next respin. But I screwed up, patch 2 is exactly the one that I said makes little sense and should be folded into patch 3. Paolo