From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wanlong Gao Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] virtio-scsi multiqueue Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 18:14:25 +0800 Message-ID: <515FF581.5040403@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1364038124-32479-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> <5153A953.2000101@cn.fujitsu.com> <515E918D.3090307@cn.fujitsu.com> <1365237613.2787.1.camel@dabdike> Reply-To: gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1365237613.2787.1.camel@dabdike> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, pbonzini@redhat.com List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 04/06/2013 04:40 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 16:55 +0800, Wanlong Gao wrote: >> On 03/28/2013 10:22 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >>> On 03/23/2013 07:28 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote: >>>> This series implements virtio-scsi queue steering, which gives >>>> performance improvements of up to 50% (measured both with QEMU and >>>> tcm_vhost backends). >>>> >>>> This version rebased on Rusty's virtio ring rework patches, which >>>> has already gone into virtio-next today. >>>> We hope this can go into virtio-next together with the virtio ring >>>> rework pathes. >>>> >>>> V7: respin to fix the patch apply error >>>> >>>> V6: rework "redo allocation of target data" (James) >>>> fix comments (Venkatesh) >>>> rebase to virtio-next >>>> >>>> V5: improving the grammar of 1/5 (Paolo) >>>> move the dropping of sg_elems to 'virtio-scsi: use virtqueue_add_sgs for command buffers'. (Asias) >>>> >>>> V4: rebase on virtio ring rework patches (rusty's pending-rebases branch) >>>> >>>> V3 and be found http://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=136067440717154&w=2 >>>> >>>> >>>> It would probably be easier to get it in via Rusty's tree >>>> because of the prerequisites. James, can we get your Acked-by? >>> >>> James, any thoughts for this version? >> >> Ping James.... > > Well, I haven't had time to look at anything other than the patch I > commented on. I'm happy with your fix, so you can add my acked by to > that one. Since it's going through the virtio tree, don't wait for me, > put it in and I'll make you fix up anything I find later that I'm > unhappy with. Got it, thank you James. Regards, Wanlong Gao > > James > > >