From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:33:08 +0800 Message-ID: <5212D564.80200@redhat.com> References: <1376630190-5912-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <1376630190-5912-3-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> <20130816095426.GA21821@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130816095426.GA21821@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 08/16/2013 05:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 01:16:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> > Switch to use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() to avoid multiple calls to >> > vhost_add_used_and_signal(). With the patch we will call at most 2 times >> > (consider done_idx warp around) compared to N times w/o this patch. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > So? Does this help performance then? > Looks like it can especially when guest does support event index. When guest enable tx interrupt, this can saves us some unnecessary signal to guest. I will do some test.