virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] vhost_net: correctly limit the max pending buffers
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 14:30:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52243071.5090303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130902055609.GC19838@redhat.com>

On 09/02/2013 01:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:29:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> As Michael point out, We used to limit the max pending DMAs to get better cache
>> utilization. But it was not done correctly since it was one done when there's no
>> new buffers submitted from guest. Guest can easily exceeds the limitation by
>> keeping sending packets.
>>
>> So this patch moves the check into main loop. Tests shows about 5%-10%
>> improvement on per cpu throughput for guest tx. But a 5% drop on per cpu
>> transaction rate for a single session TCP_RR.
> Any explanation for the drop? single session TCP_RR is unlikely to
> exceed VHOST_MAX_PEND, correct?

Unlikely to exceed. Recheck the result, looks like it was not stable
enough. Will re-test and report.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/vhost/net.c |   15 ++++-----------
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> index d09c17c..592e1f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
>> @@ -363,6 +363,10 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>  		if (zcopy)
>>  			vhost_zerocopy_signal_used(net, vq);
>>  
>> +		if ((nvq->upend_idx + vq->num - VHOST_MAX_PEND) % UIO_MAXIOV ==
>> +		    nvq->done_idx)
>> +			break;
>> +
>>  		head = vhost_get_vq_desc(&net->dev, vq, vq->iov,
>>  					 ARRAY_SIZE(vq->iov),
>>  					 &out, &in,
>> @@ -372,17 +376,6 @@ static void handle_tx(struct vhost_net *net)
>>  			break;
>>  		/* Nothing new?  Wait for eventfd to tell us they refilled. */
>>  		if (head == vq->num) {
>> -			int num_pends;
>> -
>> -			/* If more outstanding DMAs, queue the work.
>> -			 * Handle upend_idx wrap around
>> -			 */
>> -			num_pends = likely(nvq->upend_idx >= nvq->done_idx) ?
>> -				    (nvq->upend_idx - nvq->done_idx) :
>> -				    (nvq->upend_idx + UIO_MAXIOV -
>> -				     nvq->done_idx);
>> -			if (unlikely(num_pends > VHOST_MAX_PEND))
>> -				break;
>>  			if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
>>  				vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
>>  				continue;
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-02  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-30  4:29 [PATCH V2 0/6] vhost code cleanup and minor enhancement Jason Wang
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] vhost_net: make vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() returns void Jason Wang
2013-09-02  5:51   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02  6:29     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] vhost_net: use vhost_add_used_and_signal_n() in vhost_zerocopy_signal_used() Jason Wang
2013-09-02  5:50   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02  6:28     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] vhost: switch to use vhost_add_used_n() Jason Wang
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] vhost_net: determine whether or not to use zerocopy at one time Jason Wang
2013-08-30 18:35   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-09-02  3:15     ` Jason Wang
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] vhost_net: poll vhost queue after marking DMA is done Jason Wang
2013-08-30 16:44   ` Ben Hutchings
2013-09-02  3:06     ` Jason Wang
2014-02-12  7:38   ` Qin Chuanyu
     [not found]   ` <52FB24EA.3060001@huawei.com>
2014-02-12 10:06     ` Jason Wang
2014-02-12 16:01     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-30  4:29 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] vhost_net: correctly limit the max pending buffers Jason Wang
2013-09-02  5:56   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-09-02  6:30     ` Jason Wang [this message]
2013-09-02  8:37       ` Jason Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52243071.5090303@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).