From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Chegu Vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:59:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533EC8BD.8080601@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140404130012.GE10526@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 04/04/2014 09:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
> to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
> equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@infradead.org
>
> You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.
>
> I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
> moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.
Peter, I am sorry that I have focused recently on making the qspinlock
patch works with virtualization and it is easier for me to based off on
my patch initially. Now the PV part is almost done, I will apply them on
top of your patch. Hopefully, I will get a new patch out sometime next week.
I am really sorry if you have bad feeling about it. I do not mean to
discredit you on your effort to make the qspinlock patch better. I
really appreciate your input and would like to work with you on this
patch as well as other future patches.
-Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-04 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1396445259-27670-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
[not found] ` <1396445259-27670-2-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hp.com>
2014-04-04 13:00 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 14:59 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2014-04-04 17:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-07 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-04 16:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:08 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-04-07 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 16:59 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 14:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-04-07 14:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
[not found] ` <20140402143201.GF12188@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[not found] ` <533C7485.3030203@hp.com>
2014-04-03 2:10 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support Waiman Long
2014-04-03 17:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 2:57 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 16:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 17:13 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-04 17:58 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-04 18:14 ` Marcos E. Matsunaga
2014-04-04 15:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-04-07 6:14 ` Raghavendra K T
[not found] ` <5342425A.7040005@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-04-07 16:38 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-07 17:51 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-08 19:15 ` Waiman Long
2014-04-09 12:08 ` Raghavendra K T
2014-04-01 20:47 Waiman Long
2014-04-01 20:47 ` [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533EC8BD.8080601@hp.com \
--to=waiman.long@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paolo.bonzini@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).