From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Covington Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] virtio-gpu/2d: add hardware spec include file Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:53:03 -0400 Message-ID: <5411C55F.5000607@codeaurora.org> References: <1410448173-12960-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1410448173-12960-2-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1410450229.8604.16.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410450229.8604.16.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Peter Maydell , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , QEMU Developers , Dave Airlie List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 09/11/2014 11:43 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Do, 2014-09-11 at 16:20 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 11 September 2014 16:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> This patch adds the header file with structs and defines for >>> the virtio based gpu device. Covers 2d operations only. >> >> Please don't cc subscriber only mailing lists >> (virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org) on posts to qemu-devel; >> it just means everybody responding gets mailer bounce >> junkmail. > > I don't feel like splitting the discussion though. Suggestions how to > deal with that? I think I've seen most active virtio-dev folks on the > virtualization list too, is it ok to just drop virtio-dev for the next > round and hope that folks see it via virtualization list? Perhaps you and other subscribers to the offending list can BCC it and announce that it's BCC'd body. Christopher -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by the Linux Foundation.