From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] vhost: support urgent descriptors Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:30:23 +0800 Message-ID: <541F97CF.7000305@redhat.com> References: <1404203661-7521-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1404203661-7521-2-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <541BD6E9.2010707@redhat.com> <541D503B.3070507@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <541D503B.3070507@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 09/20/2014 06:00 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 19/09/2014 09:10, Jason Wang ha scritto: >>>> >>>> - if (!vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) { >>>> + if (vq->urgent || !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX)) { >> So the urgent descriptor only work when event index was not enabled? >> This seems suboptimal, we may still want to benefit from event index >> even if urgent descriptor is used. Looks like we need return true here >> when vq->urgent is true? > Its ||, not &&. > > Without event index, all descriptors are treated as urgent. > > Paolo > The problem is if vq->urgent is true, the patch checks VRING_AVAIL_F_NO_INTERRUPT bit. This bit were set unconditionally in virtqueue_enable_cb() regardless of event index feature and cleared unconditionally in virtqueue_disable_cb(). So virtqueue_enable_cb() was used to not only publish a new event index but also enable the urgent descriptor. And virtqueue_disable_cb() disabled all interrupts including the urgent descriptor. Guest won't get urgent interrupts by just adding virtqueue_add_outbuf_urgent() since what it needs is to enable and disable interrupt for !urgent descriptor. Btw, not sure "urgent" is a suitable name, since interrupt is often slow in kvm guest. And in fact virtio-net will probably use "urgent" descriptor for those packets (e.g stream packets who can be delayed a little bit to batch more bytes from userspace) who was not urgent compared to other packets.