From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Hypervisor RNG and enumeration Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:01:13 +0100 Message-ID: <5450F329.2090105@redhat.com> References: <5450C35D.1030907@citrix.com> <5450EF85.8090500@redhat.com> <5450F234.6040302@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5450F234.6040302@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: David Vrabel , Andrew Cooper , Andy Lutomirski , Linux Virtualization Cc: Mathew John , Theodore Ts'o , Jim Mattson , kvm list , Gleb Natapov , Niels Ferguson , Doug Covelli , David Hepkin , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jake Oshins , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Alok Kataria , John Starks List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 10/29/2014 02:57 PM, David Vrabel wrote: > Microsoft already has a specification to obtain a random number via an > ACPI device. The VM Generation ID. > > http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30707 That's a very different thing. The VM Generation ID always returns the same number if you run the VM from the same configuration file. It tells the VM when it might need a reseed, but provides neither a best effort random number like this spec does, nor an entropy source like virtio-rng does. Paolo