From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Sharing MSIX irq for tx/rx queue pairs
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:38:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A8FBF9.7000105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141228075226.GA25704@redhat.com>
On 12/28/2014 03:52 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 10:53:42AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> Hi all:
>>
>> This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is
>> done through:
>>
>> - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that
>> sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1)
>> - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2)
>> - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3)
>>
>> For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters
>> were simply ignored. For devices that does not use channel, it can
>> simply pass NULL or zero to virito core.
>>
>> With the patch, 1 MSIX irq were saved for each TX/RX queue pair.
>>
>> Please review.
> How does this sharing affect performance?
>
Patch 3 only checks more_used() for tx ring which in fact reduces the
effect of event index and may introduce more tx interrupts. After fixing
this issue, tested with 1 vcpu and 1 queue. No obvious changes in
performance were noticed.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-04 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-26 2:53 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Sharing MSIX irq for tx/rx queue pairs Jason Wang
2014-12-26 2:53 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] virtio-pci: introduce channels Jason Wang
2014-12-26 2:53 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] virtio: let vp_find_vqs accept channel setting paramters Jason Wang
2014-12-26 2:53 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] virtio-net: using single MSIX irq for each TX/RX queue pair Jason Wang
2014-12-26 10:17 ` Jason Wang
2014-12-28 7:52 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Sharing MSIX irq for tx/rx queue pairs Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-01-04 8:38 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-01-04 11:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-01-05 3:09 ` Jason Wang
2015-01-05 1:39 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-05 5:10 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A8FBF9.7000105@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).