From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: don't free memory until the underlying struct device has been released Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 10:03:27 -0500 Message-ID: <54A9563F.3070902@oracle.com> References: <1420228060-18721-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <1420228060-18721-2-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> <20150104112641.GB4336@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150104112641.GB4336@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Sasha Levin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "open list:VIRTIO CORE, NET..." List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 01/04/2015 06:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 02:47:40PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: >> > When releasing a virtio device, We can't free a struct virtio_device until the >> > underlying struct device has been released, which might not happen immediately >> > on device_unregister() even if that was the device's last reference. >> > >> > Instead, free the memory only once we know the device is gone in the release >> > callback. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin > > Isn't this an old bug: do we need to copy stable on a fix? > > What is the behaviour without this patch? > Is there a way to make this cause a crash? It will oops if CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE is enabled. I guess it needs to go to stable as well. Thanks, Sasha