virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	dwmw2@infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:33:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563B2275.3010406@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151103132615.53002e05.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

Am 03.11.2015 um 13:26 schrieb Cornelia Huck:
> On Tue,  3 Nov 2015 12:54:39 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones.
>> Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices
>> now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use
>> the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without PCI
>> support we also have to enable the DMA api with virtio.
> 
> Not only with virtio, but generally, right?

Yes, will update the patch description.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>> Acked-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/Kconfig                   | 3 ++-
>>  arch/s390/include/asm/device.h      | 6 +++++-
>>  arch/s390/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ++++--
>>  arch/s390/pci/pci.c                 | 1 +
>>  arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c             | 4 ++--
>>  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> index 1d57000..04f0e02 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ config S390
>>  	select GENERIC_FIND_FIRST_BIT
>>  	select GENERIC_SMP_IDLE_THREAD
>>  	select GENERIC_TIME_VSYSCALL
>> +	select HAS_DMA
>>  	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
>>  	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
>>  	select HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
>> @@ -124,6 +125,7 @@ config S390
>>  	select HAVE_CMPXCHG_DOUBLE
>>  	select HAVE_CMPXCHG_LOCAL
>>  	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
>> +	select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
>>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
>>  	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
>>  	select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
>> @@ -580,7 +582,6 @@ config QDIO
>>
>>  menuconfig PCI
>>  	bool "PCI support"
>> -	select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
>>  	select PCI_MSI
>>  	help
>>  	  Enable PCI support.
> 
> Hm. Further down in this file, there's
> 
> config HAS_DMA                                                                  
>         def_bool PCI                                                            
>         select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
> 
> Should we maybe select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG above, drop the HAS_DMA
> config option and rely on not defining NO_DMA instead?

Hmm, yes. That would simplify things a lot.  Right now we include
lib/Kconfig (which defines HAS_DMA) and define it ourselfes in 
arch/s390/Kconfig. WHoever comes first wins. Adding a select statement
would make this even more complicated.

Andy, I will simply send you a respin of this patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1446551679-33492-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
2015-11-03 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] dma: Provide simple noop dma ops Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-05 13:31   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-11-03 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] alpha/dma: use common " Christian Borntraeger
2015-11-03 11:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device " Christian Borntraeger
     [not found] ` <1446551679-33492-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
2015-11-03 12:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2015-11-05  9:33     ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2015-11-05 19:22       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-10-30 13:20 [PATCHv2 0/3] dma ops and virtio Christian Borntraeger
2015-10-30 13:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops Christian Borntraeger
     [not found] ` <1446211237-111298-4-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
2015-11-02 15:21   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-11-02 16:38   ` Sebastian Ott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563B2275.3010406@de.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).