From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 4/6] xen: add xen_pin_vcpu() to support calling functions on a dedicated pcpu Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:03:55 +0100 Message-ID: <57038D8B.9050602@citrix.com> References: <1459833007-11618-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1459833007-11618-5-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <57038927.1030205@citrix.com> <57038D0E.1040708@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57038D0E.1040708@suse.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Juergen Gross , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: jeremy@goop.org, jdelvare@suse.com, peterz@infradead.org, x86@kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, mingo@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, Douglas_Warzecha@dell.com, hpa@zytor.com, akataria@vmware.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, linux@roeck-us.net List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 05/04/16 11:01, Juergen Gross wrote: > > No, I don't think this is a good idea. In the EINVAL or EBUSY case a > simple Xen admin command might be enough to make the next call succeed. > I don't want to disable pinning in this case. Ok. Acked-by: David Vrabel David