From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 1/5] mm: support to get hints of free page blocks Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 10:52:08 +0800 Message-ID: <5B46C258.40601@intel.com> References: <1531215067-35472-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1531215067-35472-2-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <5B455D50.90902@intel.com> <20180711092152.GE20050@dhcp22.suse.cz> <5B46BB46.2080802@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, Rik van Riel , quan.xu0@gmail.com, KVM list , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , nilal@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , virtualization , linux-mm , Paolo Bonzini , Andrew Morton , Michal Hocko List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On 07/12/2018 10:30 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:17 PM Wei Wang wrote: >> Would it be better to remove __GFP_THISNODE? We actually want to get all >> the guest free pages (from all the nodes). > Maybe. Or maybe it would be better to have the memory balloon logic be > per-node? Maybe you don't want to remove too much memory from one > node? I think it's one of those "play with it" things. > > I don't think that's the big issue, actually. I think the real issue > is how to react quickly and gracefully to "oops, I'm trying to give > memory away, but now the guest wants it back" while you're in the > middle of trying to create that 2TB list of pages. OK. virtio-balloon has already registered an oom notifier (virtballoon_oom_notify). I plan to add some control there. If oom happens, - stop the page allocation; - immediately give back the allocated pages to mm. Best, Wei