Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] mm, treewide: Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive()

[Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>]

On 6/16/20 2:53 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 21:57 -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>   v4:
>>    - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter
>>      so that it can be backported to stable.
>>    - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary memzero_explicit()" patch for
>>      now as there can be a bit more discussion on what is best. It will be
>>      introduced as a separate patch later on after this one is merged.
> To this larger audience and last week without reply:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/573b3fbd5927c643920e1364230c296b23e7584d.camel@perches.com/
>
> Are there _any_ fastpath uses of kfree or vfree?

I am not sure about that, but both of them can be slow.


>
> Many patches have been posted recently to fix mispairings
> of specific types of alloc and free functions.
>
> To eliminate these mispairings at a runtime cost of four
> comparisons, should the kfree/vfree/kvfree/kfree_const
> functions be consolidated into a single kfree?
>
> Something like the below:
>
>     void kfree(const void *addr)
>     {
>     	if (is_kernel_rodata((unsigned long)addr))
>     		return;
>
>     	if (is_vmalloc_addr(addr))
>     		_vfree(addr);
>     	else
>     		_kfree(addr);
>     }
>
is_kernel_rodata() is inlined, but is_vmalloc_addr() isn't. So the 
overhead can be a bit bigger.

Cheers,
Longman