From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Glauber Costa" Subject: Re: kvm-lite, lguest64: status? Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 23:28:19 -0300 Message-ID: <5d6222a80805251928s51b9e327gd2cc8a98702af30c@mail.gmail.com> References: <4836C2C7.4010903@redhat.com> <200805261109.01065.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200805261109.01065.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Rusty Russell Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Friday 23 May 2008 23:12:39 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just a quick question: What is the status of the two projects in >> $subject? Havn't heared anything for a while for both ... > > Hi Gerd, > > lguest64 I'll punt to Glauber. For kvm-lite, frankly there wasn't enough > interest, and I wasn't going to continue it by myself: IBM certainly (and > correctly) sees virtio as more important. lguest64 has a working version, but is a little bit old. I was in the middle of an effort to merge it with lguest32 (If I can call it this way to avoid ambiguity ;-)) in linus tree, but I was preempted due to higher privileged tasks gettin into the stack. Same reason is keeping rostedt away. -- Glauber Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."