From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_mem: break device on remove
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 09:31:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ec8218e-9d76-a9b7-ccd0-b7c8ce257fe2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220117025341-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
On 17.01.22 08:55, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 02:40:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> 在 2022/1/15 上午5:43, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
>>> A common pattern for device reset is currently:
>>> vdev->config->reset(vdev);
>>> .. cleanup ..
>>>
>>> reset prevents new interrupts from arriving and waits for interrupt
>>> handlers to finish.
>>>
>>> However if - as is common - the handler queues a work request which is
>>> flushed during the cleanup stage, we have code adding buffers / trying
>>> to get buffers while device is reset. Not good.
>>>
>>> This was reproduced by running
>>> modprobe virtio_console
>>> modprobe -r virtio_console
>>> in a loop, and this reasoning seems to apply to virtio mem though
>>> I could not reproduce it there.
>>>
>>> Fix this up by calling virtio_break_device + flush before reset.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>>> index 38becd8d578c..33b8a118a3ae 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c
>>> @@ -2888,6 +2888,8 @@ static void virtio_mem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>> virtio_mem_deinit_hotplug(vm);
>>> /* reset the device and cleanup the queues */
>>> + virtio_break_device(vdev);
>>> + flush_work(&vm->wq);
>>
>>
>> We set vm->removing to true and call cancel_work_sync() in
>> virtio_mem_deinit_hotplug(). Isn't is sufficient?
>>
>> Thanks
>
>
> Hmm I think you are right. David, I will drop this for now.
> Up to you to consider whether some central capability will be
> helpful as a replacement for the virtio-mem specific "removing" flag.
It's all a bit tricky because we also have to handle pending timers and
pending memory onlining/offlining operations in a controlled way. Maybe
we could convert to virtio_break_device() and use the
&dev->vqs_list_lock as a replacement for the removal_lock. However, I'm
not 100% sure if it's nice to use that lock from
drivers/virtio/virtio_mem.c directly.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-17 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 21:43 [PATCH] virtio_mem: break device on remove Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 6:40 ` Jason Wang
2022-01-17 7:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 8:31 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2022-01-17 8:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 10:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-01-17 21:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ec8218e-9d76-a9b7-ccd0-b7c8ce257fe2@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).