From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2284EC433EF for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4BF60EB4 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:09 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org BE4BF60EB4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E54F40114; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k5vktrtv5Qdd; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06A4400BA; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E9DC0012; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775EFC000E for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED85814B5 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.b="HMOzE6zE"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=linutronix.de header.b="HT4ndX4i" Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dn0Wqjdorrgm for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96F6981551 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 09:17:04 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1636017420; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t+oc8R2xCoaL4W6NcZKyQyEStrvA2epN1TLGjnE40QE=; b=HMOzE6zEHuGzoWlUkObWAe1RWBaejOZ1B+CTGzdToY327nxws5Kz3BpG6XHG7vyzwxtFno enO854UQ6XdoM2xXbvm/NclTW6fv81xLZEvOK8k9lsmhOCRMByi54NH1jjRczxPwfRF9RH NfueZriC/AMq/IYGOMB+Tcn/C38kN6Qn+DV9t9PoazF80uHd6qDHJHsBiUgorIECnqYcGJ vOKvD9vNNrfRzfFQXzeePy9oq0sPiZW7MYShwRk+Ed8JQlPsMiQlbC0cvvkFRcjnpPUW7N pOqAxLu7+li5At6XKmpLzO3w3xFb+4gxSXVVh4rNjiC0qnSJbAYeQxmbmEc+xg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1636017420; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=t+oc8R2xCoaL4W6NcZKyQyEStrvA2epN1TLGjnE40QE=; b=HT4ndX4iQMojyhKsqdtAqwTBLq4MHo+xGydmuqF/WwEgNxJUjF421IGG/j2AbFjHoKIg2L bl1qXQgDAJsQIWCg== To: Juergen Gross , X86 ML , Linux Virtualization Subject: Re: Which tree for paravirt related patches? In-Reply-To: <60a2037d-2d4d-e9e9-edfd-b889c4bd3fb6@suse.com> References: <60a2037d-2d4d-e9e9-edfd-b889c4bd3fb6@suse.com> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 10:17:00 +0100 Message-ID: <874k8s5lgz.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Dave Hansen , IngoMolnar , Borislav Petkov , Jan Beulich X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" Juergen, On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 06:53, Juergen Gross wrote: > A recent patch modifying the core paravirt-ops functionality is > highlighting some missing MAINTAINERS information for PARAVIRT_OPS: > there is no information which tree is to be used for taking those > patches per default. In the past this was mostly handled by the tip > tree, and I think this is fine. > > X86 maintainers, are you fine with me modifying the PARAVIRT_OPS entry > to add the x86 ML and the tip tree? This way such patches will be > noticed by you and can be handled accordingly. Sure. > An alternative would be to let me carry those patches through the Xen > tree, but in lots of those patches some core x86 files are being touched > and I think the tip tree is better suited for paravirt handling. Fair enough. > And please, could you take a look at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/b8192e8a-13ef-6ac6-6364-8ba58992cd1d@suse.com/ > > This patch was the one making me notice the problem. Will do. Thanks, Thomas _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization