Re: virtio for 3.20

[Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>]

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:56:28PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
>> > Hi Rusty, all
>> >
>> > I parked outstanding virtio patches here:
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git vhost-next
>> > this way they are merged in linux-next as well.
>> >
>> > Rusty if you'll be doing 3.20 window, would you mind
>> > checking that tree to verify nothing's lost?
>> 
>> Hi Michael,
>> 
>>         Thanks, now I've returned from linux.conf.au, I'm starting to
>> organize the 3.20 queue.  I've merged this branch into my virtio-next
>> branch.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Rusty.
>
> Thanks, good to know.
> I tweaked some patches since due to test failure reports by Gerd.
> Updated patches are tagged "post-squash", if you want to see what
> changed, see fixup patches in the series tagged "pre-squash".
>
> Or you can look at my tree:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git virtio-next
> is pre-squash.
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git vhost-next
> is post-squash.

OK, I merged your vhost-next with my virtio-next, and the merge was
empty.

So we're up-to-date.  Please send patches against my virtio-next from
now on.

Thanks,
Rusty.