* Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h
[not found] ` <20231018163751.2423181-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@ 2023-10-19 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman
[not found] ` <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-10-19 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srikar Dronamraju
Cc: Valentin Schneider, Srikar Dronamraju, Peter Zijlstra,
linux-kernel, x86, Ajay Kaher, Christophe Leroy, virtualization,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers, Rohan McLure, Nicholas Piggin,
Alexey Makhalov, linuxppc-dev, Josh Poimboeuf
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> The ability to detect if the system is running in a shared processor
> mode is helpful in few more generic cases not just in
> paravirtualization.
> For example: At boot time, different scheduler/ topology flags may be
> set based on the processor mode. Hence move it to a more generic file.
I'd rather you just included paravirt.h in the few files where you need it.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> index 0372b0093f72..cf83e837a571 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -15,13 +15,6 @@
> #include <asm/kvm_guest.h>
> #include <asm/cputhreads.h>
>
> -DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(shared_processor);
> -
> -static inline bool is_shared_processor(void)
> -{
> - return static_branch_unlikely(&shared_processor);
> -}
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> extern struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
> extern struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
> @@ -77,11 +70,6 @@ static inline bool is_vcpu_idle(int vcpu)
> return lppaca_of(vcpu).idle;
> }
> #else
> -static inline bool is_shared_processor(void)
> -{
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> static inline u32 yield_count_of(int cpu)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> index aaaa576d0e15..08631b2a4528 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,20 @@ extern bool coregroup_enabled;
> extern int cpu_to_chip_id(int cpu);
> extern int *chip_id_lookup_table;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(shared_processor);
> +
> +static inline bool is_shared_processor(void)
> +{
> + return static_branch_unlikely(&shared_processor);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline bool is_shared_processor(void)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, thread_group_l1_cache_map);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, thread_group_l2_cache_map);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, thread_group_l3_cache_map);
> --
> 2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h
[not found] ` <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@ 2023-10-20 10:44 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-10-20 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srikar Dronamraju
Cc: Valentin Schneider, Peter Zijlstra, linux-kernel, x86, Ajay Kaher,
Nicholas Piggin, virtualization, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers,
Rohan McLure, Christophe Leroy, Alexey Makhalov, linuxppc-dev,
Josh Poimboeuf
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> * Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2023-10-19 15:41:40]:
>
>> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > The ability to detect if the system is running in a shared processor
>> > mode is helpful in few more generic cases not just in
>> > paravirtualization.
>> > For example: At boot time, different scheduler/ topology flags may be
>> > set based on the processor mode. Hence move it to a more generic file.
>>
>> I'd rather you just included paravirt.h in the few files where you need it.
>
> I thought, detecting if a Processor was shared or not was more a
> smp/processor related than a paravirt related.
It's both really :)
It's definitely paravirt related though, because if we weren't
*para*virt then we wouldn't know there was a hypervisor at all :)
But having smaller more focused headers is preferable in general just
for mechanical reasons.
cheers
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-20 10:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20231018163751.2423181-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20231018163751.2423181-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2023-10-19 4:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h Michael Ellerman
[not found] ` <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2023-10-20 10:44 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).