From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: virtio balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:44:54 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d24pjnkx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150302111358.GA4954@redhat.com>
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:37:26AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:50:42 +1030
>> > Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > with the recent kernel 3.19, I get a kernel warning when I start my
>> >> > KVM guest on s390 with virtio balloon enabled:
>> >>
>> >> The deeper problem is that virtio_ccw_get_config just silently fails on
>> >> OOM.
>> >>
>> >> Neither get_config nor set_config are expected to fail.
>> >
>> > AFAIK this is currently not a problem. According to
>> > http://lwn.net/Articles/627419/ these kmalloc calls never
>> > fail because they allocate less than a page.
>>
>> I strongly suggest you unlearn that fact.
>> The fix for this is in two parts:
>>
>> 1) Annotate using sched_annotate_sleep() and add a comment: we may spin
>> a few times in low memory situations, but this isn't a high
>> performance path.
>>
>> 2) Handle get_config (and other) failure in some more elegant way.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rusty.
>
> I agree, but I'd like to point out that even without kmalloc,
> on s390 get_config is blocking - it's waiting
> for a hardware interrupt.
>
> And it makes sense: config is not data path, I don't think
> we should spin there.
>
> So I think besides these two parts, we still need my two patches:
> virtio-balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING
I prefer to annotate, over trying to fix this.
Because it's not important. We might spin a few times, but it's very
unlikely, and it's certainly not performance critical.
Thanks,
Rusty.
Subject: virtio_balloon: annotate possible sleep waiting for event.
CCW (s390) does this.
Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index 0413157f3b49..3f4d5acdbde0 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
@@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ static int balloon(void *_vballoon)
s64 diff;
try_to_freeze();
+
+ /*
+ * Reading the config on the ccw backend involves an
+ * allocation, so we may actually sleep and have an
+ * extra iteration. It's extremely unlikely, and this
+ * isn't a fast path in any sense.
+ */
+ sched_annotate_sleep();
+
wait_event_interruptible(vb->config_change,
(diff = towards_target(vb)) != 0
|| vb->need_stats_update
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 10:13 virtio balloon: do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING Thomas Huth
2015-02-25 11:09 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-02-25 14:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 1:20 ` Rusty Russell
2015-02-26 7:36 ` Thomas Huth
2015-02-26 8:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-26 17:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20150226172743.GA20582@redhat.com>
2015-02-26 17:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 8:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-02-26 8:47 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20150226084529.GB24184@redhat.com>
2015-02-26 8:57 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20150226083625.2520ecb6@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
2015-03-02 0:07 ` Rusty Russell
2015-03-02 11:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20150302111358.GA4954@redhat.com>
2015-03-02 11:31 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20150302123106.54a71968.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
2015-03-02 11:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-02 12:11 ` Cornelia Huck
[not found] ` <20150302131102.2388a582.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
2015-03-02 12:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20150302121943.GD12040@redhat.com>
2015-03-02 12:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 20:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <20150302204410.GB4942@redhat.com>
2015-03-06 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-02 20:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 6:14 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-03-04 10:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-06 11:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-03-10 1:26 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d24pjnkx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).