From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: Define virtio-mmio registers as LE
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 14:27:47 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ehgijkjo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360839247-9131-1-git-send-email-pawel.moll@arm.com>
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com> writes:
> To solve the never-ending confusions between hosts and guests
> of different endianess, define all virtio-mmio registers as LE.
>
> This change should be safe at this stage, because no known
> working mixed-endian system exists so there is virtually no
> risk of breaking compatibility.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Applied. We could also move device configuration space to LE, if we
wanted. It's a bigger change to the Linux implementation, since we now
need accessors for each width, but it might be a good idea. OTOH,
getting such a change into qemu might be harder...
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-13 14:25 [RFC PATCH] virt_mmio: fix signature checking for BE guests Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 15:08 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 15:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 15:46 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 16:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-13 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-14 0:22 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-14 10:54 ` [PATCH] virtio-spec: Define virtio-mmio registers as LE Pawel Moll
2013-02-15 3:57 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-03-01 10:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-01 10:50 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-01 11:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-01 12:37 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-01 13:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-05 0:11 ` Rusty Russell
2013-03-06 15:10 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-07 6:36 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-15 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH] virt_mmio: fix signature checking for BE guests Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ehgijkjo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).