RE: [PATCH 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method

Stephen Hemminger via Virtualization
2017-02-09T18:27:27Z

Why not use existing seqlock's?

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 9:08 AM
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org; Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>; Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>; H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>; Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/vdso: Add VCLOCK_HVCLOCK vDSO clock read method

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV_TSCPAGE
> +static notrace u64 vread_hvclock(int *mode) {
> + const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *tsc_pg =
> + (const struct ms_hyperv_tsc_page *)&hvclock_page;
> + u64 sequence, scale, offset, current_tick, cur_tsc;
> +
> + while (1) {
> + sequence = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence);
> + if (!sequence)
> + break;
> +
> + scale = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_scale);
> + offset = READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_offset);
> + rdtscll(cur_tsc);
> +
> + current_tick = mul_u64_u64_shr(cur_tsc, scale, 64) + offset;
> +
> + if (READ_ONCE(tsc_pg->tsc_sequence) == sequence)
> + return current_tick;

That sequence stuff lacks still a sensible explanation. It's fundamentally different from the sequence counting we do in the kernel, so documentation for it is really required.

Thanks,

tglx