From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F044C433F5 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D88A060F70 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:59 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org D88A060F70 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux-foundation.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C17160B61; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yK0tGSd9ZKu; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.linuxfoundation.org (lf-lists.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010:104::8cd3:938]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D5460876; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lf-lists.osuosl.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F3CC0019; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D4EC000E for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E9B40504 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.b="GON8hScV"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=linutronix.de header.b="VdN/jkT+" Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkzTIvyN0rLG for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F91040502 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1636056711; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rq//ut4GNk9KUt1BHn8gasqjbgmlCpHJg3dIkQ8uM8g=; b=GON8hScVE2iUKKwrSU7sTAMM7zZWJWra5M84/tllypuRLFypXmOG3ImwMS1G93boao59J9 7fquYC1zlIjVUDLGWuq2RAnHO5Y8z5Yu0xyYmDF63lslw/CsU1NhKPVTsq7xgAwL6cm/R/ UtpayV1bZnHKEtCTxWfLP1EkG3MQWs4Q9oI8+SqlBqVxn1djJFblgmje0/smn51a3ofKdb HsEuiDQhgsAZr8NtxOZW6qBdxaTr4kAp0tlUtZD1joIgAngoOxxF1yea9U1VXmAk/uJLnO 0xd+65ZxXXkbLYXP5Z+uGVNxVE0YocsgWriglzXQYN0Enz1+IoEz+joLko5olA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1636056711; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rq//ut4GNk9KUt1BHn8gasqjbgmlCpHJg3dIkQ8uM8g=; b=VdN/jkT+2+Zn/VgqiDT/5pGTWw6f+a/FCkkCzHZXGWrjKRhCt8+z2u4RMg/EaLULegMgYp qrR7HZM2ojYGLFDQ== To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Juergen Gross , X86 ML , Linux Virtualization Subject: Re: Which tree for paravirt related patches? In-Reply-To: References: <60a2037d-2d4d-e9e9-edfd-b889c4bd3fb6@suse.com> <874k8s5lgz.ffs@tglx> <87zgqk46u7.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 21:11:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87o86z4r5k.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Hansen , Pv-drivers , IngoMolnar , Borislav Petkov , Jan Beulich , amakhalov@vmware.com X-BeenThere: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux virtualization List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Sender: "Virtualization" Srivatsa, On Thu, Nov 04 2021 at 12:09, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > On a related note, I'll be stepping in soon to assist (in place of > Deep) as a co-maintainer of the PARAVIRT_OPS interface. I had the same > query about which tree would be best for patches to the paravirt-ops > code, so I'm glad to see that it got clarified on this thread. Welcome to the club. > I'll also be taking over the maintainership of the VMware hypervisor > interface. Looking at the git logs, I believe those patches have > also been handled via the tip tree; so would it be okay to add the > x86 ML and the tip tree to the VMware hypervisor interface entry too > in the MAINTAINERS file? We've routed them through tip, yes. So yes, that's fine to have a separate entry in the maintainers file which has you and x86@kernel.org plus the tip tree mentioned. Thanks, tglx _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization