virtualization.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m@bues.ch, mpm@selenic.com,
	amit.shah@redhat.com, mb@bu3sch.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng.
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:11:23 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjbxm6fw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1415030186-18303-4-git-send-email-akong@redhat.com>

Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com> writes:
> From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
>
> current_rng holds one reference, and we bump it every time we want
> to do a read from it.
>
> This means we only hold the rng_mutex to grab or drop a reference,
> so accessing /sys/devices/virtual/misc/hw_random/rng_current doesn't
> block on read of /dev/hwrng.
>
> Using a kref is overkill (we're always under the rng_mutex), but
> a standard pattern.
>
> This also solves the problem that the hwrng_fillfn thread was
> accessing current_rng without a lock, which could change (eg. to NULL)
> underneath it.
>
> v4: decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup

This doesn't make any sense:

> +static void drop_current_rng(void)
> +{
> +	struct hwrng *rng = current_rng;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&rng_mutex));
> +	if (!current_rng)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* release current_rng reference */
> +	kref_put(&current_rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> +	current_rng = NULL;
> +
> +	/* decrease last reference for triggering the cleanup */
> +	kref_put(&rng->ref, cleanup_rng);
> +}

Why would it drop the refcount twice?  This doesn't make sense.

Hmm, because you added kref_init, which initializes the reference count
to 1, you created this bug.

Leave out the kref_init, and let it naturally be 0 (until, and if, it
becomes current_rng).  Add a comment if you want.

Thanks,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-12  3:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-03 15:56 [PATCH v4 0/6] fix hw_random stuck Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] hw_random: place mutex around read functions and buffers Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] hw_random: move some code out mutex_lock for avoiding underlying deadlock Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] hw_random: use reference counts on each struct hwrng Amos Kong
2014-11-12  3:41   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-11-17 15:20     ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] hw_random: fix unregister race Amos Kong
2014-11-10 13:47   ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-12  4:47     ` Herbert Xu
2014-11-12  4:03   ` Rusty Russell
     [not found]   ` <87y4rhm5fv.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2014-11-25  7:42     ` Amos Kong
2014-12-06  3:51     ` Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] hw_random: don't double-check old_rng Amos Kong
2014-11-03 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] hw_random: don't init list element we're about to add to list Amos Kong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zjbxm6fw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=akong@redhat.com \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).